Supreme Court: No, Ganga And Yamuna Are Not Living Entitie

The Ganga and Yamuna rivers are not considered to be a living entities, today Supreme Court said, while cancelling an earlier verdict that gave the rivers the same legal right as that of a person.

 

The Uttrakhand High Court, in March, was in an attempt to protect the rivers, as it is considered sacred by the millions, said that the river can’t be harmed and should be parties to disputes over them. In favour of a public interest the High Court ruled in public interest favour litigation against the state for the inaction in clearing encroachments on the Yamuna Bank.

 

The Hill state of the BJP government then appealed against the verdict in the top court, stating that it was "unsustainable in law."

The top court has set aside the earlier judgement on the Ganga and its longest tributary, the Yamuna. The state government said that given that the rivers run through different states, it is for the centre to frame policy on protecting them. "There is no dispute that river Ganga and Yamuna and other tributaries in India... support and assist both life and natural resources and the health and well-being of the entire community. (But) only to protect the faith of society, the rivers cannot be declared as legal persons," the government said in the Supreme Court today.

The earlier High Court judgement ordered that the two rivers be represented by the chief of the National Mission for Clean Ganga - a government body overseeing projects and conservation of the Ganga - as well as the state's chief secretary and advocate general.

Earlier this year, New Zealand declared its Whanganui river a living entity and appointed two guardians to protect its interests, making it the first river in the world to be given these rights.

 

 

For latest news on dailyaddaa, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *